Research · Papers · Direct sums, wedges and the p14 frontier · MF-166

Exact multiplicative complexity of a Fano 3-space at n = 8 and floor census at n = 4

For explicit Fano W <= Λ^2(F2^8) with dim W = 3, m_2(W) = 6 and qMC(W) = MC(W) = 7 = dim W + 4.

MF-166CLOSEDRECEIPTEDNEGATIVE RESULTDirect sums, wedges and the p14 frontier

Published 2026-09-04

For everyone

Plain summary

Multiplicative complexity counts the minimum number of AND gates needed to evaluate Boolean functions when XOR operations are free. For systems of quadratic equations over GF(2), the required multiplications often exceed the number of equations. This excess measures how much harder the system is than an independent set of gates.

We construct a 3-dimensional space of quadratic forms in 8 variables with exact multiplicative complexity 7, giving an excess of 4 without using higher-order transfer theorems. The construction arranges 2-planes in a Fano configuration matching a simplex code, so every nonzero element has maximal rank 8. We also run an exhaustive census across all 2,824 subspaces in 4 variables to catalog where standard theoretical lower-bound floors fail. The novelty of the geometric packing is unverified because simplex-code packing is standard in coding theory.

Result

Let W <= Λ^2(F2^8) be the 3-dimensional subspace spanned by vectors sum_{i ∉ L} d_i, where L ranges over the lines of a Fano configuration P_1, ..., P_7 of 2-planes in the dual of F2^8, and each d_i is the corresponding decomposable class. Then:

  1. dim W = 3, and every nonzero element in W has rank 8 with mc = 4.
  2. The coordinate code associated with W is the [7,3,4] simplex code.
  3. The 2-multiplication complexity satisfies m_2(W) = 6.
  4. qMC(W) = MC(W) = 7 = dim W + 4.

For the census across all 2,824 linear subspaces of Λ^2(F2^4):

  1. The self-contained floor ρ* matches qMC on 2,439 subspaces and underestimates qMC on 385 subspaces (210 of 651 in dimension 2, and 175 of 1,395 in dimension 3).
  2. On the 1,395 subspaces of dimension 3, the joint distribution of pairs (LB, qMC) is:
  • (3, 3): 1,220 subspaces
  • (3, 4): 105 subspaces (LB underestimates by 1)
  • (4, 4): 70 subspaces

Setting and definitions

Let GF(2) denote the two-element field, and let Λ^2(F2^n) denote the space of alternating 2-forms in n variables. The multiplicative complexity MC(W) of a subspace W <= Λ^2(F2^n) is the minimum number of multiplication gates in an XAG over GF(2) evaluating a basis of W. The quadratic multiplicative complexity qMC(W) restricts multiplications to bilinear products of linear forms.

For f ∈ Λ^2(F2^n), mc(f) denotes its rank-based multiplicative complexity, equal to half its algebraic rank over GF(2). The quantity m_2(W) denotes the 2-multiplication complexity across 2-dimensional projections of W.

A Fano configuration consists of seven 2-planes P_1, ..., P_7 in the dual of F2^8 whose incidence structure is PG(2, 2) (7 points and 7 lines). Each 2-plane determines a decomposable rank-2 class d_i ∈ Λ^2(F2^8). For each of the 7 lines L in PG(2, 2), its complement contains 4 points; the sum of the corresponding d_i forms an element of W.

The floors ρ* and LB are theoretical lower bounds on qMC derived from rank distributions and combinatorial dimension constraints.

Method

Upper and lower bounds match tightly on W <= Λ^2(F2^8):

  1. Upper bound: W <= span(d_1, ..., d_7) with each d_i decomposable (computable in 1 multiplication), so qMC(W) <= 7 and MC(W) <= 7.
  2. Quadratic lower bound: All 7 nonzero classes in W have rank 8 (mc = 4). LEMMA B₃ yields qMC(W) >= 28 / 4 = 7.
  3. General lower bound: Every 2-plane in W contains three classes of mc = 4. LEMMA B combined with Mirwald–Schnorr rank conditions establishes m_2(W) >= 6. Applying THEOREM A′ at j = 1 yields MC(W) >= 3 - 1 + 6 - 1 = 7. Thus qMC(W) = MC(W) = 7.

Search scripts identified 384 Fano configurations at n = 8. One explicit representative configuration was fully expanded, written to disk, and replayed.

For the census at n = 4, all 2,824 subspaces in Λ^2(F2^4) were generated and classified, computing exact qMC, rank distributions, ρ*, and LB.

Artifact receipts:

  • wave1-ms3/u3_fano_floor.py: Fano configuration construction and floor evaluation.
  • u3_fano_floor.json: coordinates of the 2-planes P_1, ..., P_7 in the dual of F2^8.
  • fano.py: configuration search and verification script.
  • fano_result.json: output metrics for the 384 identified configurations.
  • verify_fano.py: certificate replay and rank validation.
  • n4_full.json: census data for all 2,824 subspaces of Λ^2(F2^4).
  • n4_dim3.json: joint floor distribution on the 1,395 dimension-3 subspaces.
  • PROGRESS.log: execution logs across lines 1–61 and 101–112, detailing the 105 shortfall spaces.

Recorded evidence tiers: FR and P for the Fano space; FC for the n = 4 census.

Discussion

The construction confirms an excess of qMC(W) - dim W = 4 on a 3-dimensional space at n = 8 without 3-form transfer theorems, matching the largest transfer-proved excess in this dimension class. Rank uniformity of the [7,3,4] simplex coordinate code ensures every nonzero element has maximal rank 8.

Novelty is categorized as PARTIAL / novelty unverified. Simplex-code packing is standard in coding theory in spirit, and using its incidence structure to select linear combinations of decomposable 2-forms follows established algebraic principles.

The n = 4 census delineates the limits of standard floor functions. The self-contained floor ρ* is sharp on 2,439 of 2,824 subspaces, failing on 385 subspaces confined to dimensions 2 (210 of 651) and 3 (175 of 1,395). Upgrading to LB on the 1,395 dimension-3 subspaces matches qMC on 1,220 spaces at complexity 3 and 70 at complexity 4, and underestimates by 1 on 105 spaces.

For everyone — the takeaway

What this means

Geometric packings can force a system of quadratic equations to require significantly more AND gates than the number of equations. By assembling quadratic forms along the lines of a Fano plane, every combination keeps maximum rank, requiring 7 gates for just 3 equations.

The 4-variable census maps exactly where standard lower-bound formulas work and where they fail. Standard formulas usually find the exact gate count, but they fall short by 1 multiplication on 105 specific 3-dimensional spaces.

Attribution and prior art

Prior art: This result is partial, and its novelty remains unverified because simplex-code packing is conceptually a standard technique in coding theory.

Register references

  • Register Entry: MF-166
  • Receipt Artifacts: wave1-ms3/u3_fano_floor.py, u3_fano_floor.json, fano.py, fano_result.json, verify_fano.py, n4_full.json, n4_dim3.json, PROGRESS.log 1–61, 101–112
  • Prior Art: Simplex-code packing (standard coding theory in spirit; partial / novelty unverified)

Every artifact named above is bundled in, or hashed by, this paper's evidence pack below.

Evidence pack

Everything needed to check this entry against its receipts: the register text, a manifest with a SHA-256 hash for every named receipt, and 8 of 8 receipt files bundled (12 KB). Anything not bundled is still hashed in the manifest and lives in the compute-box working trees.

Download evidence.zip

Changelog

Last reviewed 2026-09-04

  • 2026-09-04Published on this site.

Related in this programme